Evaluations and recommendations are unbiased and solutions are independently chosen. Postmedia might receive an affiliate commission from buys built through links on this page.
Short article content
Sylvester Stallone and Jennifer Flavin did not have a prenuptial settlement when they tied the knot.
An order of abatement from the exes was granted in court docket documents obtained by TMZ on Thursday.
And even though they didn’t signal a prenup when they acquired married in May possibly 1997, the pair are assured they can concur on a divorce settlement and do so in private out of courtroom.
The order received by Folks reads: “The Events agree that is in the best interests of just about every of them individually, and additional importantly collectively as a loved ones, to take care of all challenges attendant to the dissolution of their marriage in a dignified, amicable, and personal manner out-of-court docket.”
Flavin submitted a petition “for dissolution of marriage and other relief” at a court in Florida on Aug. 19.
Stallone – who has daughters Scarlet, 20, Sistine, 24, and Sophia, 26, with his wife – subsequently mentioned in a statement: “I appreciate my loved ones. We are amicably and privately addressing these private problems.”
Having said that, Flavin accused Stallone of hiding marital belongings.
The 54-year-old product accused the Hollywood star of hiding belongings.
Court documents go through: “Upon information and facts and belief, the Husband has engaged in the intentional dissipation, depletion and/or squander of marital assets which has had an adverse economic affect on the marital estate. Pursuant to Area 61.075, Florida Statues, fairness dictates that the Spouse be compensated and created total by receiving an unequal distribution of the marital assets in her favour. Also, the Partner should really be enjoined from, marketing, transferring, assigning, encumbering, or dissipating any belongings all through the pendency of proceedings.”
Stallone, 76, denied making an attempt to “waste” joint marital property.
The Rambo actor formally responded to his estranged spouse’s divorce petition and dismissed her allegation he had “engaged in the intentional dissipation, depletion and/or waste of marital property which has experienced an adverse economic affect on the marital estate.”
The Hollywood icon’s authorized crew insisted he had “not engaged” in these conduct, whilst also opposing her ask for for “exclusive” use of their Palm Beach house.