Vancouver council approved the controversial Broadway plan late on Wednesday night, after defeating an attempt to punt the whole issue until after the next election.
Mayor Kennedy Stewart, speaking in favour of the plan, described it as “an amazing plan” to grow the Broadway corridor into “one of the most exciting neighbourhoods in the country,” dramatically increasing housing options — especially for renters — while also aiming to protect existing tenants.
But TEAM Coun. Colleen Hardwick, who has been highly critical of the plan, predicted its added density will lead to displacement of renters and higher rents and home prices and arguing it “promotes a false narrative of lack of supply.”
After the vote, Hardwick said that if she is successful in her run for mayor this year, and TEAM elects a majority to council, they would “absolutely” try to repeal the Broadway plan.
“Obviously the subway is happening, there’s no doubt about that. But there’s a good planning process, and there’s a bad planning process, and this has been a bad one,” Hardwick said. “I do think there’s a right way, and I think there’s the potential to course-correct after the election.”
Along with Stewart, seven other members of council supported the plan overall and voted in favour of most parts of it: Green Couns. Adriane Carr, Pete Fry and Michael Wiebe, OneCity Coun. Christine Boyle, and ABC Couns. Lisa Dominato, Rebecca Bligh and Sarah Kirby-Yung.
Along with Hardwick, NPA Coun. Melissa De Genova and COPE Coun. Jean Swanson said they would not support the plan, and voted against most pieces of it.
Earlier on Wednesday, council rejected Hardwick’s attempt to delay the plan until after October’s election. Near the end of a sixth day of public meetings on the issue, she proposed sending the whole plan, with amendments, back to staff to “undertake neighbourhood-based planning with the affected communities and bring it back to council for consideration after the 2022 municipal election.”
Hardwick’s proposal to postpone a decision on the plan was supported by Wiebe and De Genova. But the rest of council voted against the delay, and a heated exchange ensued.
The plan contemplates the next 30 years for an area of almost 500 city blocks along the Broadway subway line, which is under construction, envisioning increasing the population of the corridor described as Vancouver’s “second downtown.” It sets a course for additional density to the area, where city hall expects the population to increase from about 78,000 residents to as much as 128,000, and from 84,000 jobs to closer to 126,000.
More than 200 people signed up to address council on the plan, one of the highest totals for a single item in recent memory, and council heard impassioned arguments for and against it.
Hardwick said the fact that council members had prepared more than 40 amendments to the plan showed it was “not ready for prime time.”
By referring the plan back to staff, Hardwick said, “the new council can get started with this with a fresh set of eyes and fresh attitude. … We’re trying to ram it through before the end of our term, and that’s inappropriate.”
Other councillors disagreed that anything was being rammed through, considering more than three years of staff work and public consultations had gone into the plan.
“What’s behind this referral?” asked Bligh. “The reality is the mover of this referral votes against 90 per cent of development.”
Hardwick objected to that characterization from Bligh. The two councillors ran together under the NPA banner in the 2018 election, but will represent different parties in this October’s election.
When Mayor Kennedy Stewart spoke next, Hardwick objected again and the meeting became more heated.
Stewart said: “It’s not actually a referral that’s being debated here, it’s the whole concept of the plan. So I would just say, don’t refer it, vote against it. I think a referral is not genuinely what’s being debated here, I think if there’s fundamental problems with this plan, referring it back is not doing public service.”
“I do agree with Coun. Bligh, that if you are against the Broadway subway, and against the extension to UBC, and against 90 per cent of the stuff that comes to council, of course you are going to be against this plan,” Stewart said. “But really state your intentions, don’t pretend to do that with a referral. Just vote against the plan.”
Hardwick objected and said: “I feel I have been maligned by two council members,” namely Bligh and the mayor.
Stewart replied that citing a councillor’s voting record on public matters was not the same as maligning someone.
Carr, who was chairing the meeting, urged the councillors to treat each other with respect, even when they disagree.
The plan has been described, by both supporters and opponents as one of Vancouver’s biggest city-building decisions in at least a generation.
Brent Toderian, a former chief planner for Vancouver, argued in a recent Vancouver Sun commentary that the plan’s vision for a denser, transit-oriented future is needed for the city to tackle interconnected crises related to housing, climate, social equity, public health, and infrastructure.
The Broadway plan is bold, which is one reason it’s controversial, Toderian wrote, “but it is what absolutely needs to be done if we care about the future and are willing to back up our own rhetoric.”
Other prominent voices disagreed. In another Vancouver Sun commentary this week, David Ley, a professor emeritus of urban geography at the University of B.C., predicted the plan will lead to increases in land values, the loss of currently existing affordable rental housing, and the displacement of renters living there today.